Accessibility
This website is run by My Surgery Website. We want as many people as possible to be able to use this website.
For example, that means you should be able to:
We’ve also made the website text as simple as possible to understand.
AbilityNet has advice on making your device easier to use if you have a disability.
We know some parts of this website are not fully accessible:
If you need information on this website in a different format like accessible PDF, large print, easy read, audio recording or braille:
Call or email us
Email: enquires@mysurgerywebsite.co.uk
Tel: 0333 433 0021
We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 28 days.
We’re always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, contact:
My Surgery Website
Indigo House
Sussex Avenue
Hunslet
Leeds
LS10 2LF
Email: enquires@mysurgerywebsite.co.uk
Report all accessibility issues for My Surgery Website via email to enquires@mysurgerywebsite.co.uk with the email subject “Accessibility Problem”.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the ‘accessibility regulations’). If you’re not happy with how we respond to your complaint, contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS).
Northern Ireland
The Equalities Commission for Northern Ireland (ECNI) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the ‘accessibility regulations’).
My Surgery Website is committed to making its website accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.
This website is partially compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 AA standard, due to the non-compliances listed below.
Non accessible content
The content listed below is non-accessible for the following reasons.
Non-compliance with the accessibility regulations
Not all elements on a page have a unique ID. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.3.1 & 4.1.1 (Info and Relationships & Parsing).
We plan to make all elements unique by September 2020.
All input fields don’t have descriptions and role attributes. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.3.1, 3.3.2, 4.1.2 (Info and Relationships, Label or Instruction & Name, Role, Value).
We plan a description and role attributes to all input fields by September 2020.
Not all landmarks include content. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships).
We plan to make all elements unique by September 2020.
Not all labels are connected to a form control. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships).
We plan to make all elements unique by September 2020.
Not all form elements are grouped. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.3.1 & 3.3.2 (Info and Relationships Label or Instructions).
We plan to add group elements by September 2020.
The default colour combinations fail to meet the 4.5:1 contrast ratio. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.4.3 (Contrast).
We plan to add an ID by September 2020.
The content is not accessible via a keyboard. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 2.1.1 (Keyboard).
We plan to keyboard access by September 2020.
Not all pages have titles. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 2.4.2 (Page Titled).
We plan to keyboard access by September 2020.
Not all elements are focused on highlight. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 2.4.7 (Focus Visible).
We plan to keyboard access by September 2020.
The language of pages has not been set. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 3.1.1 (Language of Page).
We plan to add group elements by September 2020.
All Submit buttons don’t have the correct action type. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 3.2.2 & 4.1.2 (On Input & Name, Role, Value).
We plan to correct the button types by September 2020.
Some images do not have a text alternative, so people using a screen reader can’t access the information. This fails WCAG 1.1 success criterion 1.1.1 (Non-text Content).
My Surgery Website is a content management system and doesn’t control the images added by end-users.
Not all external link descriptions specify the link destination. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context).
My Surgery Website is a content management system and doesn’t control the content users add.
Some iframes are missing the description. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 4.1.2 (Name,Role, Value).
My Surgery Website is a content management system and doesn’t control the content provided via an iframe.
Some content contains inline styling. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships).
My Surgery Website is a content management system and doesn’t control the content users add.
YouTube fails to show audio descriptions as default. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 1.2.5 (Audio Description).
The information is from third-party software and added via an iframe on to our site. There is a setting option to turn on audio description via the video.
Dropdown menus have links to multiple destinations. This fails WCAG 2.1 success criterion 2.4.4 (Link of Purpose).
This website was last tested on 27th September 2019. The test was carried out on the My Surgery Website. We tested the site using the Chrome extension application ‘Site Improver Accessibility Checker’. The website also went under manual testing.
We tested:
This statement was prepared on 27th September 2019. It was last updated on 27th September 2019.